Rape in hospital wards in Australia

 I speak to many people about issues with mental health and there treatment and it is common knowledge. People are asking me questions about various issues.
At the boat ramp I was approached by a man who told me his daughter was admitted to a mental ward and three years later had a baby all the time being in the care of the hospital.
Then some minutes ago I was told of an elderly patient being raped in a nursing home. The way these institutions do business has to change. The denial has to stop and whistle blowers have to come forward.
I will personally blow the whistle here. These emails were the result of a magistrate abusing his powers to bully and incarcerate a member of the public. The result is these emails. What chances does one have if one were unable to defend ones self against these bullies if one is medicated sorry drugged to the hilt as was the case here.

Judicial Commission judcom@judcom.nsw.gov.au	7/31/08
to me

Dear Mr. Strik,

I refer to our recent telephone discussion concerning the complaint you made to the Commission about former Magistrate Thompson of the Local Court.

As I explained during our conversation, the Judicial Commission, in accordance with the provisions of the Judicial Officers Act, can examine complaints about the ability or behaviour of a judicial officer (a judge or magistrate). However before it can commence an examination of a complaint it must have the complaint in proper form, that is, the complaint must be in writing and the particulars of the complaint must be verified by a statutory declaration.

As you are aware, the original complaint form you lodged with the Commission was not in proper form because your signature was not witnessed by a Justice of the Peace. You were requested to re-submit the form properly executed, which you did. When the Commission received your complaint  it commenced its preliminary examination, which included confirming that the person complained about held office as a judicial officer. The Commission was advised that Mr. Thompson had retired as a magistrate.

The Judicial Officers Act requires that if a person ceases to hold office as a judicial officer the Commission must cease dealing with the complaint. This is what happened in relation to your matter. You were advised accordingly of this action.

Although I understand that in the circumstances you may wish that something further could be done about your concerns the legislation requires the Commission to cease dealing with the matter and there is nothing further it can do to assist you.

Yours faithfully,

E.J. Schmatt
Chief Executive
Judicial Commission of NSW

Dear Mr Schmatt,

I will copy correspondence of before:-

As a result of your high position you are required to treat people with dignity and respect especially when these people are the ones paying your wages through our taxation system.

Although Mr Thompson was acting in a judicial capacity, he also needs to remain accountable to the people who placed him in this position.

The initial complaint was lodged on the 30th May 2008. This was 30 days before Mr Thompson's retirement. I then per your wishes re-declared the complaint via statutory declaration on the 19th June at Gundagai. Mr Thompson did not retire for 30 days before the initial complaint was lodged. The complaint was then re lodged in an unchanged format leaving 11 days where an investigation could have continued from the earlier pre-investigation stage on the 30th May 2008.

I'm not entirely sure of the retirement procedures of the judiciary, but I can imagine, that many people know well in advance of such events taking place. As a result of this there would be a requirement on your part to act without delay from the initial complaint.

Essentially, Mr Thompson was a magistrate at the time of the complaint. The response that I initially received from your office was one of apathy and nonchalance. If this is sincerely 'all that you can do', then maybe we need to launch some law reform to add some accountability to those in the judiciary and those that monitor those in the judiciary.

I have dealt with people like you before and they can get away with outright lies in the district court in Wollongong and the local court also in Wollongong. They use their power to control people and intimidate, they get away with what they like,and are unaccountable for there actions and are the first to complain when it doesn't go their way. If you cant stand the heat get out of the job or do what you are there to do..investigate and inform me of weather i was right or wrong which you did not do.

Yours Truly,
Stewart Strik


Dear Mr. Strik,

Your interpretation of what I said in my letter of 1 July 2008 is incorrect.

What I said in that letter was that as Mr. Thompson is no longer a
judicial officer, in his case a magistrate, the Commission has no
power under the Judicial Officers Act to investigate your complaint.
If he had remained a judicial officer the complaint would have been
examined, but as he is not the Commission has simply no authority to
do anything about your concerns.

Yours faithfully,

E.J. Schmatt

 dear Mr E.J.Schmatt

 So what you are saying is anyone who is coming up to retirement or who
 is retired will not be held accountable for there actions
 i will take note of this when i get caught by a speeding camera or the
 police in the future or any other thing I might be held accountable
 for.
  thank you very much for your assistance
 So Mr Thompson decision to hold my son against his will is therefore
 unlawful as iI think my son might be retiring as well.

please note if I do not get a reasonable reply or a written appology
from Mr Thompson I will take this further

 yours truthfully

Stewart Strik	7/8/08
to burrinjuck

Dear Ms Hodgkinson,

Thank you for your letter concerning magistrate Thompson.
I just received a letter from the judicial commission of New South Wales
I will quote it here ...
"Dear Mr Strik,

I refer to your complaint you lodged with the commission in relation
to his Honour Magistrate Thompson of the Local Court.

Following receipt of your complaint form the commission received
advice that Magistrate Thompson had retired as a magistrate, effective
from 30 June,2008.As such he ceased to be a judicial officer under the
Judicial Officers Act 1986.

As magistrate Mr Thompson is no longer a judicial officer the
commission has no power to investigate your complaint and in those
circumstances I am unable to assist you in this matter.

yours faithfully,
E.J Schmatt
Chief Executive"


As this is the best they can do I would like to ask for the cases
that Mr Thompson sat on to be reviewed as I don't think justice has
prevailed.

your sincerly,
Stewart Strik

ps sorry something happened stewart

New mental disease Psychosis of DSM disorder

This new disease its called Psychosis of DSM disorder
 The main symptoms are-
1 having a phd after you name
2 having access to a pen to write a script
3 being in control of another person
4 delusions of importance
5 Not otherwise specified disorder
6 You have a large bank account but mainly pose as a psychiatrist.
7 You cannot write words that can be read by normally educated people. (Hand writing is eligible)
I have diagnosed many people with this disease and they all have been psychiatrists.

Professor Iggle Quack extraordinaire

wiki leaks

The war on drugs!

I have seen

I have seen where patients have been provoked and lash out at the staff in a mental hospital and have suffered at the hands of the staff. On one occasion the patient was pushed and the patient was then attacked by eight people with the result of several male nurses being severely hurt, two were admitted to hospital and didn't return to work for several months. The Doctors get paid more as the patient goes up the scale from one to five, five being the best paid and one the worse. The system needs a total overhaul. I personally have felt the wrath of the judicial system with me making a complaint to the judicial commission and the complaint dropped because the judicial officer retired and no further action was taken against the officer. These people are a law unto themselves. I do not have a mental illness but they can make one up out of the DSM. Quick question:- where was the last Olympic games held? Don't know then you have dementure. I will make it harder for you sports nuts. Who was the first astronaut to touch foot on the moon? Don't know yep you definitely have dementure.
This leads to you taking some psychotic drug and your freedom taken away.
They have been getting Pam to ring on the phone and hit me with a extremely loud ear piercing sound and I have reacted with some swearing then they turn the sound down so I cannot hear Pam, again with the result of me looking like being a nutter.
What does one do? Walk away from my partner and companion. There is no choice.
Cheers From professor Iggle quack extraordinaire

Mental illness posted by Iggle

Mental Illness is diagnosed with a hypothesis
The following is from Wtkipedia
 A hypothesis (from Greek ὑπόθεσις; plural hypotheses) is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. The term derives from the Greek, ὑποτιθέναι – hypotithenai meaning "to put under" or "to suppose".^[1] For a hypothesis to be put forward as a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it. Scientists generally base scientific hypotheses on previous observations that cannot satisfactorily be explained with the available scientific theories. Even though the words "hypothesis" and "theory" are often used synonymously, a scientific hypothesis is not the same as a scientific theory. A working hypothesis is a provisionally accepted hypothesis proposed for further research.^[1]
In a related but distinguishable usage, the term hypothesis is used in formal logic for the antecedent of a proposition; thus in the proposition "If P, then Q", P denotes the hypothesis (or antecedent); Q can be called a consequent. P is the assumption in a (possibly counterfactual) What If question.
The adjective hypothetical, meaning "having the nature of a hypothesis", or "being assumed to exist as an immediate consequence of a hypothesis", can refer to any of these meanings of the term "hypothesis".

DSM...Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders

I have just read the DSM and this covers all people loosely and all people could be classed as mentally ill using this diagnostic tool. This is the most disturbing  book I have ever read. It can manipulate and destroy lives of the people diagnosed with this book. This is a hideous book written by the devils henchmen.

The following is from wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnostic_and_Statistical_Manual_of_Mental_Disorders

The DSM has attracted praise for standardizing psychiatric diagnostic categories and criteria. It has also attracted controversy and criticism. Some critics argue that the DSM represents an unscientific system that enshrines the opinions of a few powerful psychiatrists. There are ongoing issues concerning the validity and reliability of the diagnostic categories; the reliance on superficial symptoms; the use of artificial dividing lines between categories and from 'normality'; possible cultural bias; medicalization of human distress and financial conflicts of interest, including with the practice of psychiatrists and with the pharmaceutical industry; political controversies about the inclusion or exclusion of diagnoses from the manual, in general or in regard to specific issues; and the experience of those who are most directly affected by the manual by being diagnosed, including the consumer/survivor movement. The publication of the DSM, with tightly guarded copyrights, now makes APA over $5 million a year, historically adding up to over $100 million.

Cover up

Pam just rang and said that they now have a photo id for medications, Why is this now just happened?
Then there is the thing of letting her into the community and letting her go to some drug dealers place from the past, rather than her coming home to her place of abode. I have now been tarnished with some psychotic disease that they have found in the DSM version V.
Anyone doctor whom cannot write legibly  has got to be of dubious character. I would go as far to say they have a mental illness. Anyone whom prescribes a drug that swells the tongue and calls it treatment has also got dreams of grandeur also has a mental illness. These are questions and answers in the DSM which define you as having a mental illness. Facts being facts then Pam's doctor of death has a mental illness he also has government approval to push psychotic drugs legally.
Never in the history of psychiatry has a single person been cured of there disease, many have died in horrible circumstances. This then becomes the cure and no charges are laid against the doctor of death.

Pam rang Pam Lost!

 I got a phone call from Pam and returned her call to the hospital and found out that she wasn't at the hospital. .Asking where she was I was told that they didn't know where she was.  Why because they couldn't read the doctor of deaths writing.  She was gone from the hospital for three days.  Yes they lost Pam.

Increase the dose. Ha Ha Ha

Severe allergic reactions (rash; hives; itching; difficulty breathing; tightness in the chest; swelling of the mouth, face, lips, or tongue; unusual hoarseness); abnormal thoughts; chest pain; confusion; decreased urination; fainting; fast, slow, or irregular heartbeat; fever, chills, or persistent sore throat; increased saliva production or drooling; increased sweating; memory loss; menstrual changes; muscle pain, weakness, or stiffness; new or worsening mental or mood changes (eg, depression, hallucinations); one-sided weakness; seizures; severe or prolonged dizziness or headache; shortness of breath; suicidal thoughts or actions; swelling of the hands, legs, or feet; symptoms of high blood sugar (eg, increased thirst, hunger, or urination; unusual weakness); symptoms of high prolactin levels (eg, enlarged breast size, decreased sexual ability, missed menstrual period, nipple discharge); tremor; trouble concentrating, speaking, or swallowing; trouble sitting still; trouble walking or standing; uncontrolled muscle movements (eg, arm or leg movements, twitching of the face or tongue, jerking or twisting); unusual bruising; vision changes; yellowing of the skin or eyes.
Pam has these symptoms is it going to kill her

tazers are good for you

Psychicraists say that electric shock is good for us.  Hundreds of people have died from there use.  Civil liberties argue against there use. The pain is intense with out leaving visable marks. Tazers are  the same catorgry as pepper sprays it is said. Electric shock from appliances in the wrong hands is lethal.

Hundreds have died after being tasered, so Tuesday's Dateline asks if tasers are really safe and whether police rely on them too much.
Is electric shock treatment used too much? Mabe you should ask the same question about EST.

The death of Brazilian man Roberto Laudisio Curti in Sydney after being tasered by police has once again thrust the safety of tasers into the headlines.
EST is used on a weekly basis in Wollongong deaths and maiming do occur.

His isn’t the first death after being incapacitated with a shock from the 50,000 volt weapon, but the manufacturers in the United States still insist they’re safe.
They say the same about EST and it is only 400volts.

On Tuesday’s Dateline at 9.30pm on SBS ONE, Nick Lazaredes gets open access to Taser International's factory in Arizona, as well as going on patrol with Portland Police in Oregon, who both vigorously defend their use.
Psychiricists say the same about EST
But he also finds a growing list of incidents where people have been left dead or seriously injured after being tasered by police… some of them without even committing any crime.
Same as mental patients here with no crime and being detained in  Australia 

So has the safety of tasers really been properly tested? And have police gone too far in relying on their use?
We know that EST is dangerous and takes lives and it has been tested on humans with deaths worldwide.

 Seems that no one are game to tackle the biggest organised rort by doctors of death world wide.

The world gone mad, psychiatrists loose control. Scientists worry that it being misused

£500 electric shock machine can boost learning and memory - but scientists worry it could be misused.

By Katie Silver
UPDATED: 14:50 GMT, 27 January 2012

• Comments (20)
• Share

Researchers have found brain stimulation via small electric shocks can boost memory and learning

A machine which stimulates your brain with tiny electric shocks can improve memory, problem-solving and mathematical abilities, psychologists have found.

But Oxford University researchers have warned that the machine could spell trouble if it gets into the wrong hands or is used incorrectly, especially when it comes to children whose brains are still developing.

While the brain-stimulation technique has been previously used to treat cognitive impairment, new research shows it can also boost mental abilities among healthy adults.
Dr Roi Cohen Kadosh, a neuroscientist, uses a high-tech system called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to stimulate precise regions of the brain with a tiny buzz of electric current. Direct current DC will jump air gaps and is more dangerous than AC just ask any electrician.
When he stimulates the parietal lobes, which are responsible for our skills in reading, writing and numeracy, he can boost mathematical skills. Yes the patient screams swearing language in mathimatical equations instead of just calling him a Quack
The electric current triggers the area to produce chemicals that cause brain cells to develop or change. This process — ‘neural plasticity’ — is essential to learning (our brains change structure when we take on new information). What have the bad reactions been and how many is there

More...

• Did bonobos actually tame themselves? Scientists find that the African apes evolved to become gentler creatures

When Dr Cohen Kadosh’s subjects had their parietal lobes stimulated for 30 minutes every day for a week, they were able to pick up maths skills through conventional lessons far more quickly and effectively than they could before.
‘It’s completely safe. Ha Ha Ha .The electric current is one thousand times lower than anything that could cause damage,’ he says.
Tests have shown that the subjects’ maths abilities remain boosted six months after the treatment. They carnt talk now or comunicate or know who you are. To someone as numerically illiterate as me, the prospect of growing a ‘maths brain’ is exciting. But Dr Cohen Kadosh’s work is at the vanguard of a medical revolution.

With very little known on the side effects of shocking the brain, vulnerable users could be exploited or even worse, have disrupted, atypical brain development

It heralds a high-tech world of brain medicine where electronics will be used to repair deep faults, such as depression and Parkinson’s, modify problem personalities and boost everyone’s ability to learn, Not me you don't. remember and think creatively.
Already a number of home ‘brain-fixers’ are available to buy. These generally work in the same way as Cohen Kadosh’s machine and are sold on the web in the U.S. (though their effectiveness is doubtful). So what makes Cohen Kadosh's work any good?
Still the psychologist, writing in the journal Current Biology, warns against the potential dangers of the technology.

Dr Roi Cohen Kadosh has warned that the device could be very dangerous if used incorrectly So how does one use it correctly

Given the devices are relatively cheap (£500) and portable and there are no laws governing their use, they could be severely misused.
The researchers say: ‘When used within suggested guidelines, the acute safety risks (of seizures, for example) seem very low. There is a danger that it can be tried out ad hoc on adults and children and is — especially on vulnerable patient groups seeking help with serious and currently intractable developmental disorders. Disorders of the doctors choise.
He said not enough is known on side effects and there are no training programs for administering the device. Yet they do it anyway.
‘At best, this situation could result in the exploitation of vulnerable patients or parents for financial gain. It is all designed for long term financial game; at worst, it may risk long-term damage to the brain and exacerbate the disadvantage, potentially worsening other psychological functions. This is sooooo true

It is especially problematic when it comes to using the device on children where misuse could not only worsen performance but could lead to ‘atypical brain development.’ Anyone whom uses this on a child in Australia is committing child abuse and If I were to know of such would personally arrest this person with a citizens arrest.
‘Like other types of atypical experience during sensitive periods, the stimulation of the wrong brain area might induce abnormal patterns of brain activity in this brain region and interconnected areas, and increase metabolic consumption in brain areas that are irrelevant to the specific psychological function. So true
‘Hence, research into the safety and potential hazards of TDCS in children is urgently needed.’ Criminal

It is also dangerous in terms of how the different parts of the brain interact:

‘Highly-developed capacities in certain cognitive domains in some individuals are accompanied by reduced functioning in others.

'It would be premature to allow children, or their parents, to make the choices that lead to higher functioning in one domain (such as language) at a cost to functioning in other valuable domains (such as face recognition).’

For this reason, he suggests that parents should perhaps be banned from using the device. It is all Ok for medical doctors to do the shocking it must be safe for them to do it. Ha Ha  Ha
‘If TDCS does enhance some abilities at a cost to others, then assessing its ethical permissibility will involve weighing its costs and benefits,’ he said

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2092704/500-electric-shock-machine-boost-learning-memory--scientists-worry-misused.html#ixzz1wX3x1UMK

The quacks won't quack

I laid down the conditions for Pam to return.
They are to give a full written report as to what has happened where we are going and when they are going to cure the problem.
They have replied and will not give me a report so as I can make decisions as to the future of treatment and there control is to continue. They are not going to lose control.
 I will apply for a court order that they do not come to my house with out some form of witnesses other than the mental health. It could come in the form of an AVO against the mental health.
I want to know what to do and how if Pam was to totally lose it.
I will ask for my doctor to get a report for me so I can make decisions in the future.